🏆 Zapier vs Wise: Who wins AI SEO?

A rubric to score and strengthen your SEO defensibility

Mar 6
 ・ 
daydream team
daydream team
🏆 Zapier vs Wise: Who wins AI SEO?

Zapier and Wise are content powerhouses, but only one has an SEO strategy built to withstand AI disruption. As search evolves, Wise’s fact-based content is increasingly vulnerable, while Zapier’s product-led approach makes it nearly untouchable.

To break this down, we’ve developed a structured framework for evaluating SEO defensibility in the AI era, complete with a scoring system to assess your own risk. Using this framework, you’ll see exactly why Wise’s strategy is at risk—and what makes Zapier’s approach far more resilient.

🔍 Understanding AI's influence on different query types

Right now, AI is particularly adept at handling top-of-funnel (TOFU) searches, where users seek quick answers. This makes purely informational content susceptible to AI displacement. 

For example, Wise’s programmatic SEO (pSEO) strategy, which relies on pages like “routing number for [bank] in [city],” is easily absorbed by AI, reducing the need for users to visit Wise’s site directly. While Wise still appears as a link in the AI synthesis, the viewer doesn’t need to click into Wise’s website to obtain the answer they are looking for. 

In contrast, Zapier’s pSEO strategy focuses on guiding users through action-oriented queries such as “How to integrate [app 1] with [app 2].” This middle-of-funnel (MOFU) strategy is more resilient to AI because searchers still need to click through to Zapier to complete the action. AI can summarize a process but struggles to execute it on behalf of users, making action-driven MOFU content inherently more defensible.


Not all MOFU content is equally defensible. The most resilient types of MOFU content provide unique value beyond what AI can easily replicate. Two primary approaches stand out:

1️⃣ Product-led content. Content that directly integrates with your product, guiding users on how to solve problems, optimize workflows, or implement solutions using your platform or service. Examples include:

  • Step-by-step integration guides (e.g., Zapier’s "How to connect [app 1] with [app 2]" content)

  • Templates that require the user to engage with a product to get value (e.g., Canva’s “[category] design template”) 

2️⃣ Content with unique data. AI is excellent at summarizing widely available information, but only you can deliver your company’s proprietary data. The most defensible proprietary data content is action-oriented—helping users make decisions, perform comparisons, or execute workflows in a way that AI alone cannot facilitate. For example, G2’s software benchmarking reports provide side-by-side comparisons that help buyers evaluate products before purchase.


So what about bottom-of-funnel queries? Even commercial queries aren’t safe from AI displacement. AI is expanding into purchase-intent queries, with AI shopping assistants performing purchase tasks from start to finish. For example, Perplexity Shop allows users to purchase items without leaving Perplexity via their Pro subscription (check out our first impression of Perplexity’s shopping experience here).

🛡️ SEO defensibility scoring framework

SEO strategies that once worked (e.g., traditional informational and keyword-centric strategies) may soon be at risk of being displaced by AI. Below is a structured approach to evaluate your SEO content mix.


Step 1: Categorize your SEO traffic by intent

Category

Definition

Risk level

Example queries

Informational (TOFU)

Users seeking knowledge or definitions. AI can answer these instantly.

High risk 🔴

"What is an ACH transfer?" 

"Routing code for [bank]"

Action-oriented (MOFU)

Users need to perform an action beyond consuming information. AI struggles to execute.

Low risk 🟢

"How to integrate X with Y" 

"Export data from Salesforce to HubSpot"

Commercial (BOFU)

Users looking to purchase a product or service. Historically safe, but AI shopping assistants may disrupt.

Moderate to high risk 🟡

"Shop Nike Air Max size 10"

"Order custom business cards”


Step 2: Score each category’s defensibility

Grade each query type using the following scale: 

  • Informational (TOFU): 1

  • Product-led and action-oriented (MOFU): 5

  • Commercial (BOFU): 3


Step 3: Calculate your blended defensibility score

Identify what percentage of your SEO content is TOFU, MOFU, and BOFU. Then, multiply each category’s defensibility score by the percentage of traffic it represents. Sum the weighted scores to determine the final blended defensibility score. 

Example Calculation:

  • 50% of traffic is informational (Score = 1)

  • 30% is action-oriented and product-led (Score = 5)

  • 20% is commercial (Score = 3)

Formula: (0.5×1) + (0.3×5) + (0.2×3) = 2.6


Step 4: Interpret your defensibility score and take action

Blended Score

At-Risk Level

Recommended Action

1.0 - 1.9

High risk 🔴

Your SEO strategy relies heavily on high-risk TOFU content that AI can easily synthesize. To reduce vulnerability:

• Shift focus away from basic informational queries and toward action-oriented content.

• Develop structured content that moves users beyond passive information consumption. (Think step-by-step tutorials, checklists, and comparison guides.)

• Replace pure definitions or broad educational content with proprietary data and expert-driven insights.

2.0 - 2.9

Moderately high risk 🟡

Your SEO mix is still too reliant on TOFU content, though some MOFU or BOFU content provides a buffer. Strengthen defensibility by:

• Investing in product-led MOFU content, such as in-depth integration guides, workflow automation tutorials, and troubleshooting resources.

• Creating content that guides users through decision-making processes, like ROI calculators and comparison guides.

3.0 - 3.9

Moderate risk 🟡

Your SEO strategy balances MOFU and BOFU content, but improvements can strengthen long-term resilience. Consider:

• Deepening coverage on complex problem-solving MOFU content, such as detailed use-case breakdowns, advanced tutorials, and expert commentary.

• Expanding MOFU purchase-intent content that helps users evaluate options (e.g., product comparison pages and decision frameworks)

4.0 - 4.9

Moderately low risk 🟢

You're in a strong position with a defensible mix of TOFU, MOFU, and BOFU content, but ongoing refinement is key. Stay ahead by:
• Experimenting with transactional content formats that AI assistants struggle to replicate, such as dynamic pricing pages or multi-step configurators.

• Expanding high-value MOFU content, like in-depth product-led case studies and product use guides.

5.0

Low risk 🟢

Your SEO strategy is highly defensible, with a strong focus on action-driven MOFU content. To maintain your lead:

• Continue evolving your product-led content strategy with more interactive, self-serve resources.

• Focus on building a durable demand engine beyond SEO, such as referral programs, exclusive communities, and personalized content experiences.

• Double down on first-party data, ensuring your insights, benchmarks, and tools remain indispensable to users.

🛡️ Example 1: Scoring Wise’s SEO defensibility

Let’s examine Wise’s content mix to determine its AI defensibility score. We’ll focus on Wise’s US site and use Ahrefs to get a general sense of the number of pages dedicated to different content types.


Step 1: categorize Wise’s content by intent

According to Ahrefs, Wise’s US site contains around 45k organic pages.

These pages are divided into multiple folders:

Page type

Number of pages (per Ahrefs)

Description

Search intent (TOFU, MOFU, BOFU)

Currency converter

~25k

These pages answer search queries for “Convert [currency 1] to [currency 2]”

TOFU

Routing numbers

~8k

These pages answer search queries for “What is the routing number for [bank name]?”

TOFU

Swift codes

~6.5k

These pages answer search queries for “What is the swift code for [bank name]?”

TOFU

Blog

~2.5k

These are long-form informational articles about various top-of-funnel topics related to banking and business (e.g., “How to wire money”)

TOFU

Stock

~1k

These pages answer queries search for “What is the stock price for [name of company]?”

TOFU

Compare

~400

These pages answer search queries for “What is the conversion rate for [bank name 1] vs. [bank name 2]?”

TOFU

IBAN

~300

These pages answer search queries for “What is the IBAN for [name of bank]?”

TOFU

Send money

~300

These pages answer search queries for “Send money from [country 1] to [country 2].”

MOFU

Business tools and templates

~200

These pages answer search queries for “Create free [business need] template.”

MOFU

Travel tipping calculator

~100

These pages answer search queries for “calculate tip in [country].”

MOFU

Travel money

~30

These pages answer search queries for “Wise [country] travel card.”

BOFU


Step 2: Score each category’s defensibility

  1. TOFU, informational content (score 1): ~44k pages

  • Currency converter, routing number, swift code, blog, stock, compare, and IBAN pages

  1. MOFU, action-oriented content (score 5): ~500 pages

  • Business tools and templates, send money, travel tipping calculator, and account comparison pages

  1. BOFU, commercial pages (score 3): ~30 pages

  • Travel money pages


Step 3: Calculate the blended defensibility score

  • 98% of Wise’s organic content is TOFU informational content

  • 1% is action-oriented, MOFU content

  • Less than 1% is BOFU, commercial content

(.98x1) + (.01x5) + (.01x3) = 1.06


Step 4: Interpret defensibility score and take action

Wise’s organic content is highly dependent on TOFU informational queries. Wise should consider doubling down on existing product-led MOFU content, specifically, “How to send money to [country].” 

These pages embed Wise functionality into queries related to sending money from the US to 200+ countries using Wise. Wise could expand these pages to “How to send money from [country 1] to [country 2]” to extend beyond US use cases. 

🛡️ Example 2: Scoring Zapier’s SEO defensibility

Let’s look at Zapier’s content mix to determine its AI defensibility score. Like the Wise breakdown, we’ll focus on Zapier’s US site and use Ahrefs to get a general sense of the number of pages dedicated to different content types.

Step 1: Categorize Zapier’s content by intent

According to Ahrefs, Zapier’s US site contains around 37k organic pages.

These pages are divided into multiple folders:

Page type

Number of pages (per Ahrefs)

Description

Search intent (TOFU, MOFU, BOFU)

Apps

~32k

These pages answer search queries for “How to integrate [App 1] with [App 2]” with step-by-step instructions for integration apps using Zapier.

MOFU

Blog

~3.5k

These are long-form informational articles about various top-of-funnel topics related to SaaS tooling (e.g., “best website generators.”)

TOFU

Share

~600

These pages are similar to the App pages but are created by users.

MOFU

Template

~150

These pages answer search queries for “AI [tool] template” with templates to deploy Zapier’s AI functionality.

MOFU

Resource

~70

These pages answer search queries related to how to use Zapier for different in-depth use cases. For example, “How to automatically add new Shopify customers to a Mailchimp Audience.”

MOFU

Engineering

~40

This is Zapier’s blog for engineers with top-of-funnel content on different topics relevant to engineering and building integrations.

TOFU

Competitor comparison

~40

These pages answer search queries for “Compare [service] to Zapier.”

MOFU

Agent

~20

These pages answer search queries for “AI agent [action] template.”

MOFU

Sign up

~5

These pages are highly transactional pages for searchers who want to sign up for Zapier.

BOFU


Step 2: Score each category’s defensibility

  1. TOFU, informational content (score 1): ~3.5k pages

  • Blog and engineering

  1. MOFU, action-oriented content (score 5): ~33k pages

  • Apps, share, template, resource, competitor comparison, and agent

  1. BOFU, commercial pages (score 3): ~5 pages

  • Sign up


Step 3: Calculate the blended defensibility score

  • 89% of Zapier’s organic content is action-oriented MOFU content

  • 9% is informational TOFU content 

  • Less than 1% is BOFU, commercial content

(.89x5) + (.09x1) + (.01x3) = 4.57


Step 4: Interpret defensibility score and take action

Zapier’s action-driven MOFU content makes its SEO strategy more resilient to AI summarization than TOFU-heavy strategies like Wise’s. However, brands like Zapier should not get complacent. 

Specifically, Zapier could double down on its agent templates. These AI-powered automation blueprints show users how to use Zapier’s AI to automate multi-step tasks. For example, Zapier’s “Inbox Categorizer” allows users to “Automatically categorize your inbox emails with relevant labels.” Zapier has created 18 of these templates so far (per Ahrefs). Introducing more of these templates could help strengthen Zapier’s defensibility as AI agents like OpenAI’s Operator gain momentum. 

Build a durable SEO growth engine with daydream

As AI transforms the search landscape, SEO defensibility is more critical than ever. At daydream, we craft resilient SEO strategies built to outlast disruption. Our full-service approach equips you with everything you need to launch and scale a powerful SEO engine that drives sustained growth. 

Need help building a future-proof SEO strategy? Let’s talk. 🚀

🚀 When you’re ready, here are 3 ways we can help:

  1. Book a Call to discuss how daydream can help you drive consistent organic growth — as we have with companies like Clay, Descript, and OpenArt.

  2. Request a custom Answer Engine Optimization Audit to learn what AI queries your brand appears for, how you stack up vs. your competition, and how much AI traffic you get.

  3. Download The Complete Guide to Programmatic SEO to learn about the frameworks and tactics used by the best experts in programmatic content.

Thanks for reading! Reply any time. 👋🏻

Until next time,
daydream

SHARE
Link copied!

https://www.withdaydream.com/library/zapier-vs-wise-who-wins-ai-seo-a

On this page
daydream journal

notes on AI, growth, and the journey from 0→n

Build an organic growth engine that drives results

THE FASTEST-GROWING STARTUPS TRUST DAYDREAM